A Solihull councillor’s remark that a local resident “ought to be taught a lesson” during a planning meeting has prompted scrutiny, after a controversial home extension—initially rejected—was later approved on appeal.
The case, involving a property on Wellsford Avenue in Solihull, concerned a retrospective planning application following construction errors. The original proposals for a single-storey and first-floor extension had been approved in April 2024, but councillors revisited the matter after changes were made to the build.
During the March meeting of Solihull Council’s planning committee, Councillor Sardul Marwa expressed his frustration with the applicant, Mr Saaid, stating:
“I think he has taken us for a ride and ought to be taught a lesson.”
The comment was made as the committee voted 6–1 to reject the revised application, with two abstentions. Residents had feared an appeal would follow—and it did.
The Planning Inspectorate has since overturned the council’s decision. In his appeal ruling, government inspector Mr Sedgwick said the differences in brickwork were minor and would fade over time, and that the extension would not significantly affect neighbours’ light, privacy or living conditions.
While no formal complaint has been lodged, Councillor Marwa’s remark has drawn criticism for its tone and potential implications under the standards expected of elected representatives.
Solihull Council’s Code of Conduct requires councillors to treat others “with respect” and to act in a way that promotes public confidence. In addition, councillors are expected to uphold the Nolan Principles of public life—seven ethical standards including integrity, accountability, openness, and objectivity in decision-making.
The principle of objectivity in particular requires decisions to be made “on merit” and without bias, while respect and leadership are also central tenets of both the Code of Conduct and the Nolan framework.
Local government observers have pointed out that comments suggesting punitive intent – even if made in frustration – can undermine public trust in the impartiality of planning decisions, especially when decisions are later overturned.
We have reached out to Solihull Council for comment on whether Councillor Marwa’s statement is under review, and to clarify the authority’s position on maintaining standards of conduct in committee meetings.
The Planning Inspectorate’s appeal decision, which granted full permission to the homeowner, can be viewed online under reference APP/Q4625/D/25/3362328.
The Solihull Journal has reached out to Solihull Council and Councillor Sardul Marwa for comment.